Proposed U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) rules governing child labor on farms continue to stoke a firestorm of criticism. Backlash has come from rural communities, agriculture advocacy groups, state and federal lawmakers.
To bolster their case, critics of the DOL proposals – which aim to update 40-year-old laws – cite everything from teaching youngsters responsibility to lessening the need for migrant labor to encouraging youth to consider a farming career as the average farmer age climbs.
For more, see here.
The DOL proposals even came up in late March during a farm bill field hearing by the House Agriculture Committee. Arkansas Rep. Rick Crawford said he’d heard from “a number of folks” about the proposed child labor laws.
Responding to Crawford, Arkansas rancher Dan Stewart said if enacted, the rules “would be devastating to the family farm. My thought is that at an early age you need to instill a love for farming. In our area, particularly, farming is more than just an economic thing. It’s a way of life and something you really want to do because, at times, it’s tough. If you don’t love what you do, you’re not going to stay in it. If you instill that in your children and grandchildren at an early age, you can continue to have the family farm.”
Bipartisan legislation has been introduced in both the House and Senate (titled “Preserving America’s Family Farm Act” -- S.2221 in the Senate and HR 4157 in the House) seeking to prevent the DOL from enacting the new restrictions.
For more, see here.
Explaining his backing of S.2221, Mississippi Sen. Thad Cochran said the DOL “has been largely unresponsive to the significant concerns raised by the agriculture community. Although the Secretary of Labor has agreed to rewrite parts of the regulations dealing with family farms, there are still enough problems with the overall rule that it should be held up. The safety of young people working on farms and ranches is important, but I question whether those writing these regulations truly understand farm life.”
State legislatures are also pushing against the DOL proposals. In late March, the Tennessee House passed a bill that says the state will not enforce federal regulations aimed at child labor on family farms. According to reports, a companion bill is in the Tennessee Senate.
For more, see here.
Through a lengthy, wide-ranging list of prohibitions, the DOL wants to stop children – over 50,000 work on farms nationwide -- from hazardous duties. That would mean, for example, no work around silos, no driving 4-wheelers, no construction work, no corralling livestock, and no work more than six feet off the ground. It would also mean, say proponents of the changes, a downturn in farm-related injuries for children, which are four times higher than work in other fields.
Critics of the DOL, however, are now pointing to a new study (see here) published by the USDA’s National Agriculture Statistics Service (NASS) showing a downturn in farm accidents without the DOL changes. Looking at injuries to youth in 2001, 2004, 2006 and 2009, NASS found that “agriculture-related injuries to youth under 20 years of age on United States farms have decreased from 13.5 injuries per 1,000 farms in 2001 to 7.2 injuries per 1,000 farms in 2009. … An injury was defined as any condition occurring on the farm operation resulting in at least four hours of restricted activity or requiring professional medical attention.”
While Farm Press was unable to get a formal interview with the DOL, a spokesperson said the department has received some 10,000 comments on the proposed rules. Currently in the process of “carefully” reviewing those comments, the DOL has not set a deadline for drafting and publishing a final rule.
When the new rules were first proposed last September, the DOL said children of farmers would be exempt. However, confusion remains about what exactly constitutes its parental exemption. In February, the department said it would “re-propose the portion of its regulation on child labor in agriculture interpreting the 'parental exemption,' most likely in early summer,” according to the spokesperson. “After the notice of proposed rulemaking is published, the public will have 60 days to comment on the proposal.”
The DOL spokesperson said the proposed rule would “increase protections for children 15 years old and younger who are employed to work on a farm that isn't owned or operated by a parent or person standing in the place of a parent” and provided the following bullet-points:
--“Hired farm workers 15 years old or younger could work on farms and would only be prohibited from doing work that has been determined to be particularly hazardous.
--“Hired farm workers 15 years old or younger may operate tractors if they are bona-fide student learners, and if the tractor is equipped with seatbelts and rollover protection structures.
--“Hired workers under 18 years old could not work off a farm in silos, grain storage bins or manure pits, which present numerous hazards in many forms. Children 15 and younger could not do this work on or off a farm.”
The spokesperson said the proposed rules would not:
--“Eliminate 4-H, FFA or other agricultural education programs.
--“Prohibit children from doing their chores or from helping a neighbor in need, for example by rounding up livestock that have escaped.
--“Prohibit children from using wheelbarrows, flashlights or screwdrivers.
--“Eliminate the statutory parental exemption, which Congress established in 1966. Under the exemption, parents or persons standing in the place of a parent may employ their children to do any hazardous work on a farm that they own or operate. They are not required to comply with federal child labor regulations that prohibit children from performing hazardous work on a farm the parents own or operate.
“By statute, children 16 years of age and older may be employed on any farm to perform any job. The proposed rule would not change this. Most work on a farm is not hazardous, and kids as young as 12 may be employed to do it.”
Despite such assurances, in a policy statement the American Farm Bureau Federation said it “opposes the DOL proposal and is working in a bipartisan manner with members of both the House and Senate to ensure that the department does not narrow the family farm exemption or unduly limit employment opportunities for youths under age 16 on farms.”
For more, see here.